T−0 days · EU AI Act enforcement · Aug 2, 2026

Know exactly where
your code breaks
the EU AI Act.

Questionnaire tools trust what you tell them. We connect to your GitHub and read the code — every violation comes back with the file, the line number, and the fix to paste. 5 minutes, not 6 weeks.

Read-only GitHub accessData stays in the EUBuilt in Stuttgart
euactguard — live scanscanning

▍

❯ scan summary

0EU AI Act articles checked
0 minscan to full report
0frameworks in one scan
€0Mmax fine you avoid
0days until enforcement

The problem

Compliance tools believe you.
Regulators won’t.

Every questionnaire tool trusts your answers. But your codebase is the actual evidence — and when it contradicts what you claimed, that’s exactly what an auditor will find.

What the questionnaire says

✓

“Human oversight is in place for all AI decisions.”

Self-assessment · Question 14 · answered by your team

CONTRADICTION
app/api/review/route.tsArt. 14 violated
  29 │ const verdict = await ai.classify(claim);
  30 │ 
→ 31 │ await db.insert(verdict);  // no review step

AI output is written straight to production. No human ever sees it.

We flag every contradiction with both pieces of evidence, side by side.

€35M

or 7% global revenue — the maximum fine

6 weeks

what consultants take. We take 5 minutes

0 lines

of your code traditional auditors read

Aug 2, 2026

high-risk AI enforcement deadline

How it works

Signup to full report
in five minutes.

01 / 03 · 30 seconds

Connect GitHub

Read-only OAuth. We never write, never clone forks, never touch your CI. Pick the repos that contain AI code.

02 / 03 · ≈ 5 minutes

One scan, five surfaces

Your repo, 20 pages of your website, your privacy policy, your Annex IV file — and the contradictions between them.

03 / 03 · PDF + web

Three reports land

Technical for your devs, legal briefing for counsel, business summary for the board. Same evidence, three languages.

GitHub repositoryWebsite crawl · 20 pagesPrivacy policy · 8 checksAnnex IV technical fileContradiction detection

Why EU ACT Guard

Evidence, not assumptions.

Reads your actual code

Every other tool reads questionnaires. We point at lib/ai-client.ts line 69 and hand you the exact fix to paste.

lib/ai-client.ts:69

Detects contradictions

You claim human oversight; your code writes AI output straight to prod. We flag it with both pieces of evidence.

claim ≠ code

Three frameworks at once

EU AI Act (legal), ISO 42001 (governance) and prEN 18286 (QMS) — the last one covered by no other tool yet.

1 scan → 3 mappings

Three reports, one scan

The right report for
every stakeholder.

One scan generates three completely different reports. Each speaks the language of its reader.

Developers & CTOs

Fix violations in your next sprint

Exact file paths, line numbers, and code context for every violation. Includes a copy-paste fix for each finding and an auto-generated Annex IV technical file draft.

What’s included

  • File path + line number for every violation
  • 3 lines of code context around each issue
  • Copy-paste code fix per finding
  • Annex IV technical file draft (8 sections)
  • ISO 42001 + prEN 18286 clause mapping
euactguard — Technical Report.pdf
Article 12 — Record KeepingCRITICAL

lib/ai-client.ts

  68 │ const client = new OpenAI();
→ 69 │ const res = await client.chat.create({
  70 │   model: 'gpt-4o',
Fix:logger.info({ event: 'ai_call', model, userId })

Annex IV Technical File

8 sections · 3 partial · 5 missing

EU AI Act

Art. 12(1)

ISO 42001

Clause 9.1

prEN 18286

Clause 7.4

Generated by euactguard · Reg. (EU) 2024/1689Not legal advice
Now accepting early access signups

Run your first scan free.
No card. No call.

Connect your GitHub and see your exact EU AI Act violations in 5 minutes. The first 3 findings are free — join the waitlist to unlock everything.

❯euactguard scan --repo your-org/your-app▍
Run free scan →

Read-only · EU data (Ireland) · No credit card